Side-by-side
AccessComply vs. Accessibility Spark
Accessibility Spark markets an AI-powered accessibility solution for Shopify, combining scanning and overlay-style adjustments.
Source-code fixes
Real changes to your Liquid, HTML and CSS
JavaScript overlay
Modifies the rendered DOM at runtime
Feature comparison
The differences that affect your store.
| Feature | AccessComply | Accessibility Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Methodology | Source-code fixes (Liquid / HTML / CSS) | AI-driven overlay / runtime adjustment |
| Auto-fix coverage | Eligible source-mapped issues with manual review for risky changes | Runtime DOM modifications via injected script |
| WCAG 2.2 support | Yes — scans against 2.1 + 2.2 AA | Marketed for WCAG |
| EAA compliance reporting | Built-in — per-country mapping for all 27 EU members | Generic reports |
| Pre-fix theme backup + rollback | Yes | N/A — does not modify source code |
| Continuous monitoring | Daily / weekly / monthly schedules | Available |
| Accessibility statement generator | Yes | Yes |
| Free tier | 3 scans / month | Free trial |
| Starting paid plan | $49 / month | Pricing on request |
| Native Shopify app | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
Why teams choose AccessComply.
AI-driven overlays still leave the underlying source code unchanged. AccessComply's AI agents generate code that we then commit to your theme — not runtime patches.
AccessComply's validator re-runs axe-core after every fix to confirm the violation is actually resolved before the change persists.
You can preview every diff, approve every fix, and roll back any change. With overlays, what runs in production depends on a third-party JS bundle being available.
See your violations in 30 seconds.
Free scan. No signup. No credit card. Get the same data Accessibility Spark would charge you to see.